R. K. NARAYAN’S ART
AND
‘THE VENDOR OF SWEETS’
Lecturer
in English, D.
R.
K. Narayan’s art is a triumph of ironic
transcendence. His irony is a rich compound of broad humour
and sympathy, gentle mockery and genial ridicule. The method
is ‘to mock at the thing dearest to one’s heart,’ and, of course, irony is
always compatible with the most intense feelings. In irony there is no scope
either for the arid realms of dreary non-sentimental thinking or for a
hysterical and lavish sentimentality. Delicate irony is a measure of detached
observation and it illumines the character of a person while exposing his
weaknesses. It arouses love in us for the person whom the author intends to be
loved and here R. K. Narayan succeeds marvellously.
An
outstanding gift of R. K. Narayan as a writer is his
capacity to affect, as it were, a comedic catharsis, the cathartic happiness so
urgently needed in these days of arid cackle of dry-bones of humour either bitter or disillusioned or cynical. In R. K. Narayan we have a laughter
intensely happy, not in the least tainted by cynicism and never by bitterness.
There is pure sentiment and good humour corrected
from cheap sentimentality by detached and loving irony. The final result is
pure aesthetic delight, happiness and peace.
R. K. Narayan’s latest novel, The
Vendor of Sweets again to be hailed with great delight and pleasure.
It has the un-mistakable stamp of the individuality and genius of R. K. Narayan as a writer. There are the same delightfully vivid
and picturesque evocations of a South Indian middle-class life and there is the
same inimitable, incomparable and irrepressible humour
tempered with humanity and flavoured with irony.
There are again his wonderfully keen powers of observation, masterly strokes of
satire which softy bite, humour which tickles and
pinches irresistibly and yet leaves the mark. Instances may be taken from
almost any page of the novel. To take a sample: ‘A street dog lay Snoring on a
heap of stones on the road side, kept there since the first municipal body was
elected for Free India in 1947 and meant for paving the road.’ In the same way
the description of the vagrant waiting to eat the remains on the dining leaves
to be cast out of houses after dinner and Jagan
throbbing for a moment with several national and international problems and
their ramifications is both humorous and deeply touching.
The
character of Jagan, the 55-year-old vendor of sweets,
is broad and firm in outline, convincing and natural in full personality and
essentially true to nature. Jagan’s character is a
curious mixture of innocence and shrewdness, humble simplicity and delightful
eccentricity and he has a heart full of tenderness for his late wife and his
‘poor boy.’ He is a strict follower of Gandhi in all matters, in Truth,
Satyagraha, Charkha-spinning, in dress, not the
least, in non-violent footwear. His never-to-be-published magnum opus is
on Nature Cure and Natural Diet with his immense faith in the properties of margosa, for brushing the teeth or for relief from
headache, incorporating his ideas on ‘the whole secret or human energy’ and
dietetic prevention or cure for premature white hair.
And
yet we ask, as the ‘cousin’ (to the whole town) in the story asks and never
bothers to know, why this man who has apparently perfected the art of living on
nothing should go on working and earning, taking all the trouble? The author
himself with an uncanny stroke of irony strips him bare by saying that as long
as he bears the frying and sizzling noise in the kitchen his gaze is fixed on
the lines of the Bhagavad Gita and once it stops he
cries out ‘What is happening?’ Another stroke of the author is that Jagan keeps two categories of cash–one that can be
inspected by anyone, the other to be viewed as ‘free cash’ perhaps
self-generated and entitled to survive without reference to any tax. And why,
again we ask, is all this for this devout Gandhian
follower, a simple man with harmless eccentricities? Well, perhaps, there is
always a fascinating touch of mystery and inexplicability in the humble heroes
of R. K. Narayan.
If
Narayan’s The Guide was a novel of intricate
story, zig-zag narration, complicated technical
flourishes, a picture of hectic activity and straining tempo, with a young,
romantic, irresponsible type of man as a hero, The Vendor of Sweets is a
somewhat straight-forward, conventional but not unexciting novel with a humble,
responsible, tender-hearted middle-class parent as a hero. From one point view
it is a perfect picture of the ever-growing tension in–son relationships
nowadays; a picture of a humble, tender-father, Jagan,
facing an irresponsible, ultra-modern, rebellious son, Mali, and at its level
of universality, it presents a sharp and disturbing clash of generations. As an
old widower fondly in love with his son Jagan suffers
the utmost when his son shocks him as a foreign-returned, ostentatiously
business-minded would-be celebrity with nothing but mocks and insults and
sneers for him, his ideas, his humble profession of the vending of sweets. It
is after all with his money and love that
Jagan at a symbolic level
suffers the gall and sorrow, confusion and bewilderment of the traditional,
uncontaminated old Indian generation when sneered at and jettisoned by the
artificial civilisation with its machine-produced literature and strange
values. The Vendor of Sweets is thus from one point of view a vivid
picture of traditional India set against modern India that is being rapidly westernised and uprooted to be planted in unhealthy alien
soil. Perhaps a synthesis is to be awaited but at present there is only the
widening, deepening gulf of generations, the old rapidly receding into the
background, the new not yet attaining even material prosperity. A stage has to
come, of course, of achieved material prosperity and retained spirituality in
From
another point of view The Vendor of Sweets recreates most vividly and
convincingly the life of the common man in
Jagan’s
business-mindedness and his adherence to the Gita are apparently incompatible
traits of this simple good man but these contradictory traits are only
superficial because as long as one is in the world, with necessary chains of
love and affection one must “do” something for them, to answer the claims of
the world. He becomes apparently a man of the world with a conscience that
seems to be at once nodding and nagging, with an understanding that is neither
too analytical nor outstandingly spiritual and he remains as one essentially
true to nature.
A
man, of necessity, should turn spiritual, some day or other, young or old, the
cause may be frustrated love, or a termagant wife, or a rude shock from
too-loved children, or from pure philosophical searchings.
When that point comes, from whom the inspiration comes and from which
conviction is achieved, we don’t know. And in the story of The Vendor of
Sweets it comes through the strange and mysterious sculptor-disciple, now
turned hair-blackener. He communicates to Jagan his
master’s blissful vision of the supreme five-faced goddess, Gayatri,
the Gayatri-mantra being the most universal in its
meaning and significance and the most accredited and indisputable in the whole
world as the supreme mantra for the highest meditation, in order to know and realise the Supreme, the Ultimate, whose meditation is
incorporated (indeed, it occupies the central part) in the Hindu Sandhyavandanam, the daily three-time prayer-meditation of
every true Hindu.
Thus,
again and again, we see that beneath an apparent puckish lightheartedness,
frivolity and flippancy, a mere no-meaning light entertainment there is in R.
K. Narayan a true sincerity, an intense preoccupation
with the great traditions and values of
Regarding the technical aspect of the novel, it must be said that it is most satisfying in simplicity of plan and wonderful symmetry and arrangement of parts each with exciting twists and sustaining narration. The central crisis or turning point is well-placed and well-worked out and is, in the end, merged with the last climax. The last yet greater climax, the act of renunciation, arises, as it were, out of the earlier climax which is the sudden baffling decision to give up the preoccupation with the profits and which gives rise to the symbolic act of reducing the price of the sweet-packets.
The
action, the mental states and the moods are described with wonderful charm. A
pure, innocent reflectiveness, given to constant brooding,
melancholy or happy, sad or sapient, musings and half-musings over the past,
the present or the future–these make up the best technique adopted by Narayan to recreate in flesh and blood the full personality
of lagan, to lay bare his innermost thoughts and feelings before us. And in the
vague, hazy, foggy reflecting and brooding mind of Jagan
there is something sweet and irresistibly attractive. And in the last long
brooding over the past just before his renunciation we have a most charming,
delicious, nostalgic, reminiscent picture of Jagan’s
past life of youth and marriage. There is a special appeal to the heart as the
author describes the sweet sentiments, the delicate feelings and noble
traditions in Hindu marriages and morals. The description, the recreated
picture, of the married life of Jagan covering a
pretty span of life, from the exact point of his shedding his bachelorhood to
the point of Mali’s estrangement, is very vivid, subtle, delicate yet insinuating
and intoxicating. His present life as the vendor of sweets concerned with
R.
K. Narayan in a way is a distracting though
unobtrusive puzzle to many. Where lies the merit of Narayan, and what is
his actual achievement that brings him such a stupendous popularity and
higher recognition? Perhaps the answer is that there is a transcendence in R. K. Narayan
which conceals itself. There is a Tennysonian
deceptive simplicity and lightness concealing the depths and complexities of
his art. Here is a good example in Indo-Anglian
fiction of art concealing art. Every one is irresistibly attracted to the work
of R. K. Narayan. A sense of overpowering intimacy is
established and the characters become intimate personalities after our heart.
Perhaps there is simple magic, the magic of delicious and divine humour that tickles and tantalizes, thrills and illumines,
combining humanity, sympathy and love. He affects this comedic catharsis in the
most compelling and in the most natural way in us. And if one is not to be
driven to distraction and cynicism and depression by the bewildering couple of
modern mechanical and insipid existence, the artificial life of the straining,
confusing, drying modernity one is to take a dip in, nay, a full infusion of,
the healthy, sweet, invigorating life-springs of R. K. Narayan’s
honour which combines in a unique way life’s comedy
and pathos, sweetness and sadness.