MAHOPADHYAYA SANKHYAYANA SARMA
B. RAJABHUSHANA RAO
Advocate,
Sri
Mahopadhyaya Achanta Venkataraya Sankhyayana Sarma, whose bIrth centenary the
State of
Even
by his first public appearance in the literary arena, he emerged not as a
novice but as a master, not as a seeker but as an authority, among the
litterateurs of his time. He had no need to pass through the usual phases of
apprenticeship and probation. With his impressive lineaments and imposing
intellect, with his capacious mind that earned him the name of a walking encyclopaedia with his clarity and alacrity of intellect
and with his powers of quick repartee coupled with genial humour,
he easily dominated and captivated any literary gathering that he attended. His
was a masterful personality, and when he spoke, he held the audience in his
palm. It was no wonder that his knowledge that was at once deep, varied and
expansive evoked glowing tributes from contemporary leaders of thought in
various fields. He lived at a time when one of the passions of the Andhra
writers was to bring the Andhra public in touch with the treasures of Sanskrit
literature, and if he translated in running prose Bhavabhuti’s
Uttara Rama Charitram, a masterpiece of pathos and brought out in
Telugu Kalidas’s Vikramorvasiyam
conceived and depicted in a classical setting, it was because Mr. Sarma was moved by a similar desire to serve the Andhra
people. He also produced original works, a social drama entitled Manorama having for its theme a type of
sub-communal wrangle rampant in his days Partha
Parajayam an unpublished work, Avadata Kalabhakam adapted
from Buddhistic literature Utsrishtikarnam
a species of drama poignantly pathetic, Rahasya
Darpanam and Andhra Padyavali.
He founded a journal known as Kalpalata,
which dealt, as its name indicated, with almost every subject under the
sun, including politics, which no journal had by then ever thought of touching
upon. To mention that he was its editor is an understatement. Except a
negligible portion, almost every column of it contained only his contribution.
He wrote seriously as well as in a lighter vein and his originality and
spirit of research were reflected in it. He was the first scholar that told
the Andhras that, besides Srinadha,
another poet Mukkavalli Venkayya
had fully translated the Naishadha Kavyam of Sri harsha,
and cited verses from the translation. The journal posed certain literary
questions and puzzles, and prizes for the best answers were awarded in the
order of merit. It was this feature of it in
particular that made it a meeting ground and common platform for many a
literary aspirant. One of the lifelong unions between two different writers,
then widely separated in several respects, but later well-known as literary
twins by the name of Venkataparvateeswara Kavulu or poets was brought about by this journal. Nataka Sarvasvam, an
unpublished work of his, was hailed by leading men of letters that came across
it and are still fortunately with us as a unique and invaluable contribution to
the science of literary criticism particularly of the drama.
He presided over many literary conferences and delivered thoughtful and thought-provoking addresses which were mostly extempore. Special mention must however be made of his Presidential Address at Tanuku at the 13th session of the Andhra Sahitya Parishat in 1924. It discussed some of the fundamental aspects of the origin and the growth of the Andhra language and literature and was assessed as one of the classics of Telugu. One must also mention that a controversy, which had been raging in the Andhra country for many years over the use of the colloquial or the grammatical expression in literary works, reached its climax at this session and threatened to create a permanent and unbridgeable chasm between the two schools of thought. It was the genuine and the innate tact of Mr. Sarma that averted what might have otherwise turned out to be a cultural disaster for the Andhras. He had the ability to silence opposition without rousing passions. Even if he often smashed an interruption by his powerful retort, he immediately rounded it off by a humorous observation that left behind no trail of bitterness. In recognition of his prodigious knowledge and talents, the popular title of Mahopadhyaya was conferred on him at the sixth session of the Sarasvata Conference at Tenali. Some of his extempore verses, which were not however recorded, gained large currency. He was also a patron of the stage, and he actively participated in founding the Andhra Nataka Kala Parishad and presided over its first conference at Tenali.
His
literary and artistic performances and achievements art but an
expression of a tiny fragment of his all round personality. Essentially,
he was of a scientific bent of mind, and given adequate opportunities for the
full play of his scientific faculties and researches, he
would have been one of the top ranking scientists of his day. He believed and
wrote for the benefit of the layman on scientific subjects, avoiding almost
completely the use of the technical diction. He was thus the forerunner of the
later movements and trials for bringing out scientific works in the vernacular
languages. He was also reported to have made bold predictions which later materialised in the shape of scientific inventions. Unlike
most of the religious conservatives of the West or the traditional scholars of
the East, he not only accepted the Darwinian theory of evolution and the origin
of the species but made further speculations on its basis. One of the favourite branches of his scientific study was Geology.
Some of the schemes for mining which he took up and executed
as the Diwan of Chinamerangi
Estate brought him into touch with foreign experts, who took him
for a professional engineer. None the less, some of the projects which he
planned and tried to implement were more worthy of a cabinet minister of an
independent State than of a Diwan of a small estate
with limited resources. His imagination often outrunning his caution, he landed
himself and his Zamindar in financial difficulties.
He
was a centre of attraction to his contemporaries
interested in culture and knowledge. He was holding what might be called a
literary Darbar, a word that came to be
associated afterwards with the late Sri Mutnuri Krishnarao, the illustrious editor of the Andhra Weekly
known as