‘Lotus of Delight’
(A Critical
Appreciation of Vidyapati)
By
PARSHARAM C. BATRA, M.A.
A reader may take the poems of Vidyapati in whichever way he pleases. If he is one of those who can see no more in them than a collection of rich and sensuous love-lyrics, he has the right to enjoy them in that light. If he thinks of the poems as a unique collection dealing with the Divine Love, while employing the language of human love for its expression, he will (though I have no quarrel with the first) be nearer to my way of thinking.
Except
for one or two bare facts we know little of Vidyapati’s life. He lived in Bihar
in the first half of the fifteenth century and wrote his works under the
patronage of Raja Shivasimha Rupanarayana. He wrote many works in Sanskrit but
the lyrical poems are cast in Maithili, his mothertongue. (Maithili is a blend
of Hindi and Sanskrit. It is a rich and vivid dialect.)
Vidyapati
Thakur is a mystic poet of the Vaishnava School. Vaishnava poets have all along
accepted the joys and pleasures that life offers them in all its varied
manifestations. As mystics they ceaselessly aspire towards union with God. Both
these experiences, namely, of the human and the Divine Love are harmoniously
blended in their poetry. Not only that. The experience of the human love is
taken as a stepping stone to the understanding of the joy in Divine Love. So we
find the language, or better, the symbolism of the human love employed to draw
our attention to those thoughts which lie beyond the reaches of the human soul.*
“Not
my way of salvation to surrender the world,” says a Vaishnava poet. He however,
also means to be true to his mystic experience. For that too is real to him. He
like a true genius will so temper and harmonise the two experiences that
one should lead to the other:
“
My passion shall burn as the flame of my salvation,
The
flower of my love shall become the ripe fruit of my devotion.”
There
was one theme to which Vidyapati was deeply devoted, a theme which has inspired
several poets of our Motherland–namely, Radha’s love for Krishna. His Bangya
Padabli is a cycle of love lyrics celebrating the love of Krishna and
Radha–courtship of God and the Soul–enumerating the various phases it has to
live through before achieving ultimate union.
In
the first part of the cycle, we have Lord Krishna passing through the forest
that lay near by Gokula; the milk-maids are making merry and the Lord espies
them all. One amongst them overpowers him. She is Radha. On beholding this
‘phantom of delight’ the Lord is spell-bound–
“Even
an instant to behold such loveliness
Suffices
to eclipse the triple worlds:
But
could I see her once again,
My
mourning may depart!”
He
must pursue this phantom with a lotus-like face and sun-bright eyes, with
jet-black flowing tresses that fall over her snow-white breasts as if jealously
guarding them, or know no peace of mind. He is that ravished–madan-maddened
as the poet calls him.
God
is on the chase. Will He overtake the Soul? In Vidyapati’s delineation of
Radha, there is everything to be enraptured about: a woman one feels mad to
kiss; a face and a shape that swells into reality. And no wonder he is mistaken
for a mere voluptuous poet. There is, however, more in him than meets the eye.
Let us pause and consider the poem which follows them, a poem which sums up the
thought underlying them all: –
“He
honey life, you honey-heap,
Already
hiding hoarded sweets, –
The
maddened bee has neither home
Nor
rest without your jasmine self.”
It
means just this. God knows no rest without the Soul. Enamoured Krishna tries to
get in touch with Radha. Were she but to see Him once, she would pine a
hundred-fold more intensely than what He does for her. One day Radha when
playing with her gopis beholds the Lord:
“Her
partridge-eyes beholding Krishna's moon-fair face,
Were
drinking draughts of dew:
Each
on the other gazing, spread abroad the taste of bliss,
That
Vidyapati knoweth well.”
In
the second phase of the cycle we have the Soul yearning for God. Soul, in the
shape of Radha, fearfully and diffidently approaches its God-head, incarnate in
Krishna. It is Radha’s fate now to bewail her lot:
“How
shall I tell of Kanu’s beauty,
Who
shall describe the dream shape?”
and
again,
“I
cannot tell what the dear thief has done to me:
When
I beheld him he did steal my heart, and went away,
And
as he went he showed so many signs of love:
The
more I would forget, the less I may.”
Radha
is fond and foolish–an artless maid who knows not the art of dalliance. Waves
of emotion sweep through her. Who is to save her when she is about to lose her
identity in him? It is a consummation devoutly wished for, and yet, the heart
trembles at the thought of it; the fear of the unknown overpowers her. The
bridge has to be crossed; a leap into the unknown has to be taken. Let Radha
make her resolve.
Radha
prepares to face the Lord. Who is to do her toilet: she cannot bind her own
hair? She trembles so. With side-long glances she appeals to her sakhis to
help her. Leaning on their support she enters the bridal chamber. This is how
she afterwards recounted the eventful night:
“My
body shivered at the sight of him,
He
was so eager that he sprang on me;
I
lost my wits in his embrace,
How
can 1 tell what amorous play he played?”
The
Lord, too, is overjoyed: –
“How
many ways she kissed me,
Laughing light and low in gladness,
Diversely disporting,
My dream of delight!”
“What
shocks the virtuous philosopher delights the chameleon poet.” Vidyapati
delights in closely following the similes of human love. All he means by this
allegorical language is that the Soul has tasted the joy of union.
When
Krishna fails to turn up when the night falls, Radha goes forth to meet him.
Dangers beset her path, but nothing can hold her back:
“The
night is very thick and black,
But Love lights up the gloom.”
That
is very true: nothing can stay the God-tormented Soul.
Then
follows separation.
Radha
is devoured by the pangs of loneliness; she feels uprooted. There is no mirth
in her talk; the lovely dimple on her cheek dies away; smiles no more play on
her lips. How can the soul brook to be thwarted from it God-head?
Radha
stands the ordeal of separation with fortitude and courage. At times, though,
the anguish is overpowering: –
“What
can I say of the pangs of disunion,
Hearken, most cruel Kanu?”
and again, momentarily
overcome by her grief, she is led to suspect his fidelity:
“What
like is she my Lord has met,
That he is so enamoured?
Some maid he must have found, my Lord is
glad,
And
plunges in my heart an arrow.”
These thoughts are, however, like a passing summer shower.
At
last Radha realises that true love and service is self-realization and
self-expression. Krishna returns to Gokula, and with tears of joy she
hears her Lord’s whisper: “Can I forget my dear and gentle lady?” The meeting
of the two lovers is a treat to behold:
“Rare
was the meeting of one with the other
The grief of disunion vanished afar,”
and
“
He has taken her hand and put her down on the painted seat,
The jewel Shyama disports with the jewel–damsel.”
Rangya
Padabli is verily a bouquet of delight in which and
lyrical note are indissolubly merged in each other.
*
Rabindtanath Tagore is the latest representative of the
Vaishnava School of poets.