FOR VALUES UNCOMMERCIAL
D.
ANJANEYULU
Was
it not Oscar Wilde who defined a cynic as one who knew the price of everything
and the value of nothing? I do not know how he would have summed up an
idealist. As one who knew the value of everything and the
price of nothing? There was at least one man in our time who knew the
value of a good thing, when he saw it. And he did not count the cost in getting
it, if he could humanly afford it. And not for his own
benefit either. He went by the name of Ramakotiswara Rau.
To
call him a missionary in the realm of periodical journalism might
be a conventional way of paying a well-deserved tribute to his
single-mindedness and spirit of dedication to a chosen cause. But
it would hardly be doing justice to the breath of poetry that he brought to a
pitiless world guided by the prosaic values of security,
success and solvency. To the casual onlooker, who tends to take most things for
granted, he did not seem to wear his poetry on his brow nor his
heart on his sleeve. He was too shy and reticent for that. He preferred not to
draw too much attention to himself by any of the external aspects that had only a marginal importance in his order of priorities.
“Image-building” was not in his line.
It
was some three decades ago that I chanced to see him in the flesh for the first
time in my life. He was invited to preside over the cultural section of a
students’ conference in
Ramakotiswara Rau was
essentially a simple man–simple in his dress and deportment, in his talk and in
everything else. But neat and tidy he was. Perhaps, he could not help being so,
as one came to know for oneself of the utter purity of the man–in
thought, word and deed. He had the fairness and absolute candour
to declare how impressed he was with the paper in English read by a young man,
a student leader, whose political antecedents were not quite acceptable to many
of the elders of the day. It was on the role of youth
in modern
Not
before the lapse of a few more years it was that I began to discover, for
myself, the priceless treasures hidden in the back numbers of Triveni. The
severe simplicity of its cover pages would give no clue to the quality and
variety of the contents. Once the outer crust is broken by the sharpening
intelligence of the initiated reader, he has found an opening into the
limitless realms of gold. I can never forget the hours of unmixed delight that
I used to spend in the Municipal library at Tenali
and the Connemara Public Library in
Humayun Kabir discoursing on the
philosophical theories of Kant and Hegel, Hiren Mukerjee expatiating on the features of Indian Federalism,
Dr. Pattabhi scattering his homely wit and mature
wisdom on a wide variety of problems from the pros and cons of office
acceptance to the economics of Khadi.
How is one to describe the coruscating brilliance of the political and literary
pieces of the young Mr. M. Chalapathi Rau, including
the ‘Indian Caravan’ and ‘Viceroys of India’ ‘G. K. Chesterton’ and others? Iswara Dutt could be seen in the
pages, refining his brush for the paintings in his portrait gallery. The
editor’s Triple Stream would be a much-needed change from an array of
such multi-coloured springs and waterfalls to clear springwater, cool and soothing.
If
the journal represented the triple stream of art, literature and history, the
editor symbolised, in his person, the triple stream
of love, friendship and empathy. The first was necessarily restricted to
a few. The second extended to a wider circle that cut across all barriers of
language, region, and religious faith. The third he could withhold from none of
his contributors, whatever be the degree of personal acquaintance. He was quick
to recognise promise, not as a patron, but as a
friend and elder brother. He was absolutely sincere and could at times be
sentimental–embarrassingly so. He would go out of his way to tell the young
writer what he liked in him, and what he should do well to guard against. Quite
a few brilliant young men, who became well-known writers and journalists, in
due course, would have preferred to be office superintendents or, middling
lawyers in the moffusil courts but for Triveni and
its editor.
The
twenty-five reprints sent by Ramakotiswara Rau were cherished by his contributors
in the good old days more than as many Rupees from other hands. (And this when a Rupee meant a lot more in its purchasing power
than it does now.) More than being a writer himself he was the cause
that writing was and grew in others. One man tried to do, as a labour of love, for the Indian Renaissance. What a number
of institutions are now proud to do for a price and an army of individuals for
a living. The periodical that he started was not only his shield and armour. It was a mirror to his soul. Many an editor there
is who lives on his periodical. Ramakotiswara Rau lived for it. Each issue of Triveni
was, for him, a dream come true. It was a continual process. He is gone
from us. But the dream remains. For, without dreams, life won’t be worth living.
At least, for those not content merely to exist.