FIFTH
GENERAL ELECTIONS TO
LOK
SABHA IN ANDHRA PRADESH
Principal,
M. R. College, Vizianagaram
A General Election in a modern democracy is an event of great significance, for it gives an opportunity to the electorate to give its verdict on the conduct of the sitting members and to open its mind over the people’s basic requirements. A General Election is a barometer to measure the political maturity of the electorate and the strength of the political parties in the country and cuts each party to its proper size. The political landslides and surprises that occur at the time of elections cannot be attributed solely to the whipped up emotions of the electorate and strategy of leaders. As usual in such cases the victorious party paid high tribute to the sagacity of the electorate and the defeated parties stressed on the diabolic pressures to which the electorate succumbed. Mrs. Indira Gandhi observed that “the country’s verdict in the Lok Sabha mid-term poll was for her party’s socio-economic programmes” and that the nation has shown “a certain amount of involvement in the election.”1 Mr. C. Rajagopalachari, however, commented that the mid-term election was “unscrupulously hustled” and it is “only a by-product of the stinking permit-licence raj and the money power and unscrupulousness that have inundated over politics.” 2 In analyzing the behaviour of a vast electorate of 272 millions, it is not difficult to quote instances to justify one’s own conclusions. In all the states the most outstanding feature in the electoral behaviour is the sharp reaction of the electorate against the instability of the Government at the Centre which some unscrupulous party politicians tried to create by the intra-party struggle in the Congress. The Hindu in its editorial rightly observed that “in what was thought to be the most crucial election in two decades of the Republic, the people have returned a clear and unequivocal verdict. Mrs. Gandhi campaigned on the main plank of stability.” 3
One
significant feature in the mid-term poll is the de-linking of Parliamentary and
State Assembly elections with a view to give the electorate an opportunity to
think of national issues as different from State issues. However, in three
states–West Bengal, Tamil Nadu and Orissa–elections were held simultaneously.
For the first time since the attainment of Independence elections to the Lok
Sabha were conducted separately. But undue significance need not be attached to
this factor, for the simultaneous conduct of election to the Lok Sabha and to
the State Assemblies in West Bengal, Tamil Nadu and Orissa did not alter the
general pattern of voting in those states. It must be said to the credit of the
electorate that “the people made it their election and it seemed as if the
entire Indian people were fighting for the direction in which the country is to
move.” 4 Incidentally, the mid-term election disproves the view that
India has a “segmented political system, and political developments which occur
in one segment do not affect developments in another.” 5 In a vast
country like India diversity will always exist but this should not make us
ignore the unity that exists in the national thought. The mid-term poll
indicates beyond doubt that the electorate was fed up with the opportunistic
united fronts and voted for a stable Government at the Centre. However, each
State has its own problems which have their impact on electoral behaviour and
such differences make an individual study of the mid-term election in Andhra
Pradesh relevant.
Viewed from the point of representation in the Lok Sabha, Andhra Pradesh with a membership of 41, stands the fourth biggest State in India. Among the southern states, Andhra Pradesh tops the list in electoral strength. Out of 3,42,980 polling stations constituted to elect 518 members, in Andhra Pradesh alone 28,000 polling stations were established. The elections in A. P. cost about Rs. 1,07,49,500. India is described as the most populous democracy in the world with an electorate of about 27.26 crores and in Andhra Pradesh the strength of the electorate is 2.27 crores. In spite of the close up of the ranks of the opposition parties so as to create a straight fight with the Ruling Congress, the number of canditates that contested for the 41 seats was pretty high. 328 candidates originally filed their nominations and 6 of them were declared invalid. 115 candidates withdrew their nominations and 207 fought the electoral battle. There were no unopposed returns and every one of the 41 seats was contested. In a democracy the failure of sitting members, especially ex-ministers, is a sign of the unpopularity of the previous administration. In the mid-term election out of the seven ministers who stood for re-election, only one Deputy Minister who contested from Telangana was defeated.
Sophisticated
studies on the voters turn out at the time of elections led writers like Mr.
Myron Weiner to observe that states which have high voting turn out are also
states which have high urbanization, literacy, circulation of newspapers and
radio listening. Judged from these variables, the extent of political
participation should have been low as Andhra Pradesh occupies the 7th or 8th
rank among the states in India in matters like literacy, urbanization and
newspaper circulation. As against the all-India average of 29.35 per cent,
Andhra Pradesh has a literacy of 24.56 per cent only.6 Political
participation of people in Andhra Pradesh, however, disproves the theory that
there is relation between the variables cited above and the voter turn out at
the time of elections. While 54.8 per cent on the average exercised their
franchise in India, 59.05 per cent exercised their franchise in Andhra. Pradesh
in the 1971 mid term elections. In all the five General Elections hitherto
conducted, voter turn out in Andhra Pradesh has been consistently pretty high.
No doubt, as in the case of all other states, in Andhra Pradesh also the
percentage of voting in the Fifth General Elections has fallen. For example, in
the 1967 elections 68.6% of the voters participated, while only 59.05% voted in
1971 in Andhra Pradesh. The corresponding all-India percentages are 61.32 per
cent and 54.8 per cent. Another variable that can be taken into account for
judging the political maturity of the electorate is the number of votes declared
invalid. In Andhra Pradesh the total number of votes polled was 1,34,02,662 and
only 3,47,012 votes were declared invalid. This indicates the understanding
attained by the voters in the proper use of the ballot paper.
A
general feature in the political life of all nations is that though women
constitute nearly half of the total population of the country, their
representation in the legislatures is very poor. Even in a developed nation
like the U.S., there is only one woman in the Senate and 11 women are in the
House of Representatives. In India while women form 49 per cent of the total
population as well as the country’s electorate, women candidates for the Lok
Sabha poll constitute an insignificant 3.2 per cent of the total number of
contestants. Out of a total of 2,785 candidates only 80 are women.7
Out of the women candidates fielded by the political parties only 13 could come
out victorious. In Andhra Pradesh 6 women candidates contested the elections
and only 2 could succeed.
One
marked development in Indian politics is the shift from personal to
institutional power. “Among the institutionalized politics the bulk of the
candidates who forfeited deposits were Independents, not party candidates.
Compared
to many other developing nations India in virtually all of its states has a
more institutionalized political process.” 8 It is significant to
note that in A. P., out of the 94 candidates who contested as Indepedents 91
forfeited their deposits and only one candidate won in the election. The Independents
secured 8.14 percentage of votes polled. Even that single candidate, Sri P. V.
G. Raju (Rajah of Vizianagaram) was a member of the A. I. C. C. and openly
announced his affiliation to the Ruling Congress which he has joined
subsequently.
A
statistical study of the election results indicates the reeling reverse faced
by the parties which formed the U. D. F. and the large number of seats bagged
by Ruling Congress which is disproportionate to the percentage of votes secured
by it. 9
Party
Seats contested Seats won Percentage of votes polled
Ruling Congress 37 28 55.60
Congress (0) 12 - 5.59
Jana Sangh 5 - 1.53
Swatantra 9 - 4.40
S. S. P. 2 - 0.37
T. P. S. 14 10 14.43
C. P. I. 11 1 6.00
C. P. M. 5 1 2.83
Labour Party 6 - 0.37
Telangana Congress 7 - 0.38
Republican Party of
India 4 - 0.36
Independents
(Including the
Backward Classes
Mahasabha) 95 1 8.14
Total 207 41 100.0
The
disparity between the percentage of votes secured by a party and the number of
seats in the legislature which it secured is found in all the states. This
anomaly, it is felt by some political thinkers in India, can be checked by
adopting the system of proportional representation.
The
above cited data relating to the electoral fortunes of the parties throw
light on certain aspects which are peculiar to Andhra Pradesh. The first aspect
relates to the decline of the Communist party in Andhra Pradesh. Next to Bengal
and Kerala, the Communist party has some measurable strength in Andhra Pradesh.
But the recent elections have revealed the waning power of the Communist party
in Andhra Pradesh.
Party
Total votes polled in 1967 Total votes polled in 1971
C.
P. I. 1,551,223,
(11.4% of 7,76,019
(6% of votes
votes
polled) polled)
C.P.M.
1,003,485 (7.4% of
8,68,677
(2.38% of votes
votes
polled) polled)
Second
aspect worthy of note is the role of rural leadership. The ecology of Andhra
Pradesh indicates that rural life and agrarian economy are the determining
factors in the elections. With the introduction of Panchayat Raj the party
which controlled the rural administration could play a vital role in
determining the electoral result. In Andhra Pradesh “The Congress generally
mobilised its voters through the Panchayat Raj chiefs instead of directly
approaching the voters through public meetings. Each Samithi President had
influence over 40 or 50 Village Panchayat Presidents who in turn had under them
about 600 to 800 voters.” 10
The
third aspect relates to the role of caste in Andhra politics. Morris Jones
remarked, “the Central discovery is that politics is more important to castes
and castes are more important in politics than even before.” 11 As
caste is an age-long institution, its place in the life of people cannot be
ignored. There is some truth in the remark that “behind the formal lists of
party candidates nominated for the
contests, there is probably an inside story of careful calculation in terms of
caste appeal.” 12 In Rayalaseema, euphemistically called
“Reddiseema” all the four candidates that won the election belong to the Reddi
community. In regard to caste as a political force two observations become
relevant. Firstly, behind caste is the economic factor. The Kammas and Reddis
own vast landed properties and thereby possess great control over the rural
folk. It is their economic power rather than caste affiliation that is largely
responsible for their dominance in politics. Secondly, there are several
instances to show that the electorate voted irrespective of caste. For example,
Sri K. L. Rao, Sri P. V. G. Raju and Sri M. T. Raju were not
voted on considerations of caste. The electorate has not been swayed by caste
fanaticism in the case of persons of proved merit and integrity.
The
fourth aspect which makes the mid-term poll in A. P. most significant is the
Telangana vote. In the general elections of 1967 the Congress under the
leadership of Sri K. Brahmananda Reddi won 35 of the 41 seats. But the
agitation for a separate Telangana State has shaken his leadership in Telangana
as can be noticed from region-wise success of the parties given below:
Party
Coastal Andhra Rayalaseema Telangana Total
Congress (R) 22 3 3 28
T. P. S. - - 10 10
C. P. I. - 1 - 1
C. P. M. - - - 1
Independents 1 - - 1
41
On
the basis of the electoral result members of the Telangana Praja Samithi argue
that the vast majority of people in that region have voted for a
separate Telangana State. The voting pattern in Telangana, as can be noticed
from the following data, was quite in favour of the
separatists. 13
Party No. of votes polled Percentage of
votes polled
Congress (R) 12,83,491 31.6
T. P. S. 18,73,589 46.3
C. P. I. 1,57,893 3.9
J. S. 54,630 1.3
S. S. P. 40,853 1.0
Telangana Congress 43,748 1.1
Out of the total electorate of 74,46,988, the votes polled numbered 40,47,107. That is, some 54.4 per cent of the electors exercised their franchise. Commenting on the election result the executive of the A. I. C. C. (R) congratulated the people of Telangana on having pricked the bubble of separation and on standing by the forces of integration and progress. This interpretation is based on two considerations: (1) 46 per cent of the electorate did not vote and thereby they silently supported the integrationists. From this line of argument the conclusion is drawn that the T. P. S. votes were only just over 25 per cent of the electorate. (2) Even in certain constituencies where the T. P. S. won, it secured only a small majority. In the ten constituencies in which the T. P. S. won, in two constituencies only it secured a decisive victory as shown below:
Close
contest
Margin
of 25,000 votes 3 constituencies
Fair
contest 25,000-75,000 5 constituencies
Remote
contest 75,000 + 2
constituencies
This
line of argument hardly breaks any ice. No party under the present system of
voting can secure absolute majority of the total electoral vote. Further,
besides the votes secured by the T.P.S. the votes of the other parties that
supported the separatist movement should also be taken into account. In such a
case it has to be said that 54.7 per cent of the polled votes had been secured
by the separatists. “The Chief Minister himself recently acknowledged the
strength of separatist sentiment by presenting a separate budget for
Telangana.” 14
The
mind of the electorate cannot be correctly understood by making an arithmetical
approach to election results. The spirit of the electoral verdict and the
conditions under which the verdict was given have to be closely studied. A
party which fights the election on an emotional issue will always sweep the
polls. The party’s success is the result of public emotion and not public
opinion. The emotions of the people of Telangana have been whipped, up in
favour of a separate Telangana State by a few leaders whose personal animosity
against the Chief Minister are quite well-known. What the people of Telangana
really require is economic progress. If programmes for its economic development
are vigorously implemented the separatist agitation will subside. Further,
steps may be taken to ensure regional autonomy and to give effective
representation to Telangana on the Cabinet.
In
a big State like A. P., with a population of 43,394,951 having diverse
interests, tensions in one region or other may exist and some regional groups
may make capital out of such emotional tensions. A party whose strength depends
on an emotional issue cannot survive for long. On a sober consideration it can
be said that the position of the Ruling Congress party in Andhra Pradesh is quite
safe. The programmes for the large-scale industrialisation the State has made
the Congress party (R) quite popular. The opposition parties have neither an
appealing alternative programme nor party cadre to establish mass contact.
Whatever may his foibles Mr. K. Brahmanada Reddi’s leadership is by and large
appreciated by the people. He is held as “right-to-the-centre man.” By
his opposition to the reduction of the size of land ceilings he is held by land
owners as the protector of their interests. Ever since the
inception of Andhra as a separate State, the Congress party alone has been in
power without a break. So it could strongly consolidate its position in the
State and there is no likelihood of the Congress party (R) being toppled down
in the foreseeable future.
1 Indian
Express, March 12, ’71
2 Indian
Express, March 13, ’71
3 The
Hindu, March 12, ’71
4 Dr.
A. Appadorai: “The mid-term poll and after.” Eastern Economist. April 9,
1971.
5 Myron
Weiner: State Politics in India.
6 Indian
Express, April 15, 1971
7 The
Hindu, February 21, 1971
8 Myron
Weiner: State Politics in India
9 Indian
Express, March 14, 1971
10 The
Hindu, February 24, 1971
11 The
Government and Politics of India, p.
65
12 Ibid.
p. 66
13 Indian
Express, March 13, ’71
14
“The Road to Telangana,” The Statesman. March 24, 1971