A
SEEKER OF BEAUTY–A PERFECTIONIST
A.
JANAKIRAM
It
is difficult, after an association of forty years, to say when, exactly, you
met a certain friend of yours. So many events of special significance have
overshadowed the ecstacy of the first meeting. As a
matter of fact, in the case of a few people–as it was in the case of Sri
Ramakotiswara Rau–each meeting seemed to be the first meeting. The fervour with which he accepted your hand and the enthusiasm
with which he spoke of the progress–or the opposite–of Triveni, made you
feel that it was the very first occasion of your meeting.
My
translation of a famous poem of Devulapalli Venkata Krishna Sastri appeared in the first number of Triveni.
Ramakotiswara Rau was fond of saying that I was present at the inaugural
function of Triveni, when he was staying at the Malabari
House, Vepery. I do remember going there: but I do
not remember being present at the function. But, all the same, Ramakotiswara
Rau used to say on many occasions, “Well! He should have been there–if he was
not there–and I will regard him as one of the founder-members of the–now
world-famous–magazine Triveni”. Indeed, it is a proud thing to be one of
the founder-members of Triveni.
I
remember one occasion, rather, vividly, when I was
shown Ramakotiswara Rau, from a little distance, but I do not think we were
formally introduced to each other at that time. It was in a house in
Ramakotiswara
Rau was a seeker of beauty–a perfectionist, perhaps to a fault. I have known
him to condemn a whole form of his magazine and have the entire matter
re-composed when he discovered a compositor's error. The cost of re-doing
sixteen pages did not matter to him, nor the trouble
to go through it once again. It was this pursuit of perfection which made him
the remarkable person he was. Ramakotiswara Rau, as editor of Triveni, would
give up many things to see his journal beautiful. One may say that he dedicated
his life to the journal which he made very famous indeed. There is ample proof
that though the journal did not have a large circulation, it did have a
discerning circle of readers. Once, when I was in
Ramakotiswara
Rau’s absence from the cultural field just at this time is no small loss to us.
Triveni would infuse new hope to people rather dissatisfied with the
present state of things. Ramakotiswara Rau was a true apostle of culture. He
was also most hopeful, when everything around him appeared as hopeless. One has
but to hope that the person or persons on whom the burden of continuing the
publication of the journal has fallen will carry on the tradition established
by him. It may be a voice in the wilderness, but the voice of Triveni has
been powerful. The greatest tribute that the present generation of writers and
readers can pay to Ramakotiswara Rau would be to see that the Triveni will
continue to thrive–even if the odds are very much against it. Ramakotiswara Rau
set an example of self-less devotion to a cause which it is hoped will be
followed.