A NATIONALIST AND AN IDEALIST
B.
RAJABHUSHANA RAO
Former
Associate Editor, ‘Triveni’
It
is not my usual habit or practice to project myself in the first person into
what I write about any friend however intimate. I always try to take a detached
and dispassionate view and to give to the best of my ability an impartial
appraisal. If I have now made a departure, the reason is simple. I cannot make
a distinction between the objective and the subjective approaches when I write
of Sri Ramakotiswara Rau.
I came into contact
with him in or about 1927 at
Sri
Ramakotiswara Rau was a nationalist and an idealist in every fibre of his being and was not prepared for any deviation
from the straight path. When he resigned his position as Principal of Andhra Jateeya Kalasala, presumably by
way of disapproval of what he thought was a compromise on a point of principle
made by the college, I heard several friends characterising
him as a visionary and finding fault with him for his so-called indiscretion. I
never had any doubts about the propriety of his action, though I never wanted
to discuss it with him. If it becomes impossible to run an institution without
swerving from its original course, why run it at all at the sacrifice of the
very object for which it was founded? I never had any
illusions about the fact that no institution is greater than its ideal. To my
mind this is simple logic and clear thinking. To me this
perspective always appeared to be one not shaped by love of mere theory but
based on sound common sense and practical politics, if we do not import into
that expression the modern connotation of Whether I had the stamina to live up
to my Ideals or not, I never failed to recognize and respect them in another.
Sri
Ramakotiswara Rau’s patriotism built from the very early years of his life on
the love of the culture and the high traditions of the mother country burnt
like a steady flame till the end of his life. All the same, it was free even
from a remote trace of aggressiveness, and it never found an outlet in
impassioned expression, of which I was somewhat guilty on occasions. One
characteristic common to both of us was that neither my intense hatred of the
foreign rule nor his ardent zeal for Indian freedom impaired our appreciation
of the English literature. Sri Ramakotiswara Rau believed in writing English of
the purest vintage, but was averse to an affected style.
In
the midst of his difficulties, which, being the result of his lofty ideals,
were entirely of his own making, he preserved his genial temper and his usual
hospitality and warmth for friends. I never found him speaking ill of another,
not because of his inability to size up the variety of character that he came
across but, as I believe, because of his innate goodness. To say anything
against anybody behind him or, in other words, to back-bite him was cowardice
or hypocricy, while to speak anything unpleasant to
the face of any person would be bad manners. It was impossible for him to do
either of the wrongs.
“The
Triveni is a high-class production–bright and elegant. Its appeal is to
a highly cultivated, select few. To make it succeed is a difficult task. The
men and women among us, who combine taste, judgment, leisure and means are not many. I am inclined to congratulate you on the
success you have attained. I wish somehow the writers and subscribers would try
to make it possible for you to keep up the beautiful Triveni.”
–The
Rt. Hon. V. S. Srinivasa Sastri
in a letter to
Sri.
Ramakotiswara Rau.