THE ORIENTAL ELEMENT IN HENRY MILLER
DR. RANGANATH NANDYAL
Literature knows no
racial or national boundaries. Oriental literatures – which are basically
idealistic and
spiritualistic
– have been attracting the eclectic and the receptive American minds for about
two centuries. The great transcendentalists – Emerson, Thoreau, and Whitman –
derived not only information and inspiration but also illumination from
Oriental thought. Hundreds of American thinkers toed the line of the sage of
Concord and joined the tradition of transcendentalism. Henry Miller also
belonged to this great tradition.
Miller was essentially a Satyanveshi,
a seeker of Truth. In fact his entire life was a search – a search for Peace,
Truth, and Self-realization. He asked himself: Where did I come from? Where do
I go? Is life an empty and meaningless accident? Has life got any purpose? He
looked for answers As an inveterate reader and haunter of libraries, he
nourished himself on the ideas and ideals of the prophets of past. He heard the
music of the ancient wisdom of the Orient; he thoroughly absorbed it. He
studied not only books but life also; he passed through many phases and
experiences; he become a vagabond, a bohemian, an outsider; and ultimately he
reached the stage of a sage.
A writer’s creative work
is like a mirror which reflects his own mind. In all his writings, Miller’s
sympathy and admiration for Oriental scriptures, Oriental personalities and
Oriental concepts are clearly reflected. A serious study of his life and writings
with regard to the Oriental influence on Miller–would be fascinating and
revealing.
Regarding Miller’s
attitude towards sex, the influence of ancient Indian thought on Miller is
unmistakable. Like ancient Indians, he too believed that sex was neither
immoral nor moral, but it was amoral; and what was fundamental and justified in
life was also fundamental and justified in art. That is why, as in the case of
ancient Indian sculpture and literature, discussions of sex and sexual
activities and descriptions of male and female anatomies are rampant in some of
the works of Miller. His knowledge of Kamasutra and Ananga Ranga seemed
to have come to his help while describing some of the scenes of love-play in
the Tropics as well as The Rosy Crucifixion. Like the Tantriks,
Miller too believed that Bhoga (pleasure) and Yoga are complementary; as
also body and spinto Also, like the Tantriks, who employed the Panchatava
as to eradicate the poisons in the human system, Miller too used obscenity in
his writings as a form of medication and catharsis.
Miller too, like Indian
thinkers, gave paramount importance to truth and sincerity; and tried to be
sincere in executing his duties as a writer: He reported what he believed was
the whole truth about the nature of man – however unpleasant the truth might
be. He, too, neither condemned nor looked down upon the sinner for there was no
individual who was utterly evil and God manifested through evil as well as
good. Undoubtedly Indian thinkers like Sri Ramakrishna, Swami Vivekananda, and J. Krishnamurti influenced
Miller regarding his attitude towards morality.
Further, regarding
Miller’s attitude towards the concepts of “The Individual”, “Self-Reliance”,
and “Destiny”, there is an indelible impact of J. Krishnamurti, Swami
Vivekananda, and The Bhagavad Gita on Miller. Like J. Krishnamurti, Miller too
believed that the world problem was the individual problem and so the
individual should reform himself radically before trying to reform the world.
Like Swami Vivekananda, Miller too thought that man possessed infinite power
within himself, and so stressed the importance of strength in human life and
decried weakness. Like The Bhagavad Gita, Miller wanted everybody to do
his part to the best of his ability regardless of consequences and firmly
believed that man was the architect of his own destiny.
Miller’s views on the
concept of “The Ideal Man” are similar to those of Indian thinkers. He too,
like Indian thinkers, visualized that the ideal man would transcend the
dualities like pleasure and pain, good and evil, and would work with detachment
regardless of results and that the unknown Buddhas would belong to the upper
rung among the ideal men.
Indian thought directly
influenced Miller regarding his attitude towards religion and God. Like Swami
Vivekananda, he thought that religion should be practical and he never believed
in dogmas or rituals. Religion, in Miller grew with his life and helped him to
transform his life. Like ancient Indian thinkers, he too thought that life was
an opportunity for self-realization. He, like the hero Siddhartha of Hermann
Hesse, passed from one stage to another – from the stage of a vagabond of New
York to that of a sage of Big Sur. Also, like Indian mystics, he tried to
communicate with God and tried to, contemplate on himself as a part of the
universal soul.
Miller’s attitude towards
cosmic consciousness or mysticism is similar to Indian attitude. Like Indian
mystics, he tried to expand his consciousness to experience a sense of total
unity with the entire universe. Regarding Miller’s attitude towards life, Zen
Buddhism influenced him profoundly. Like Mahatma Gandhi, he too believed that
art was only a means to fuller life and that the greatest artist was he who led
the finest life. He sincerely practised the doctrine of detachment enunciated
by The Bhagavad Gita. Like Zen Buddhists he was interested in being
rather than doing; and he adopted the philosophy of acceptance to such an
extent that one can call him a Zen Buddhist.
In Miller’s life
and writings, there are some aspects, situations, and passages wherein the
influence of Oriental thought is direct and unmistakable; in some other places,
there are some parallels or similarities between Oriental thought and Henry
Miller’s. Hence the existence of Oriental element in Henry Miller is
unquestionable.