Philosophy

Dr. R. Rabindranath Menon

 

The term is familiar, not its contents,

it’s an overcoat to cover all the vents

of expression from closed tents.

Challenged by and between dilemma’s horns,

one taking it as the Ultima Thule

of all knowledge, the others a mere schedule

of views oft conflicting; its real role

few comprehended, as a time-bound

compendium of knowledge in a sound

framework of pros and cons

that probes, propounds and warns

against take certainties, to find the truth.

Philosophies abound and each age

perceives a truth-face perhaps

according to its ability and intent,

and each discovery we need to gage

against the time, it’s level, it’s stage

of developing a liberal visage.

Conception of right and wrong differ

even of nobility and meanness,

and each era distils its thoughts to offer

its judgment, free at times of under duress.

The grand mist of time covers all,

and truth survives in the final roll-call.

 

Adavaita, Dvaita, and Vishistadvaita,

Monism, dualism and in between

cogitations valid in respective scenes.

Sartre’s humanism where existence

preceded essence, the Hegelian insistence

an force and a tragic view of time’s tense

progress, the ubiquitous presence

of Marxian dialectics, each has a place

as a phase or aspect of truth and can’t replace 

the other without a valid doubt’s trace

 

Back