MADHURA
BHAKTI AND SUFISM
Dr. N. Anantha
Lakshmi
Unity in
diversity is the basic character of Indian civilization. Though the regions, religions, languages and
all other customs vary superficially, there is an underlying current that keeps
all these things in oneness. The main
stream in that current is the culture, in which religion and philosophy are
very important components. Though the languages
are many in India, multi-lingualism and cultural and philosophical language
Sanskrit kept this vast sub-continent united.
On this land, at different times, different religions originated, lived,
loved and fought. But the togetherness
and unity were sustained. Whenever a
new religion, race or language came in contact with the natives of India,
Indian thought and way of life which has no beginning
(Sanathanadharma),interacts with it, and gets enriched by its ideology without any inhibition and in turn
this rich repository of culture naturally influences the other. This interaction and convergence help in
overcoming the barriers and realising the commonness of humanity in all.
The mutual enrichment of Indian
philosophical thought and Sufism has political, social and cultural relevance
as well.
Indian and Greek trade relations were the
cause of the influence of Indian philosophy on Sufism. Sufism entered India in
9th century, spread widely in 10th century and bloomed
after the Muslim rule.
Before we
start the comparative study we must know the necessary and basic tenets of
Sufism. Some defined the word Sufi as
the people who stand in the front row.
Some say that the ‘Fakirs’ who always stay in the premises of Madina are
called Sufi. Still some say that Sufi
is a morphologically changed form of ‘Sofia’ which means knowledge. Some others related the word to ‘Sofa’ which
means cleanliness. According to some others it has come out of the word Suffah
which denotes a variety of devotees.
Some others related it to ‘Soof’ i.e. wool, as the pioneers of Sufism
used to wear coarse woolen blankets, which is a symbol of renunciation of the
material world. By all these
definitions and meanings it can be concluded that sufism is a religion where
cleanliness of the heart, knowledge etc., are given much importance.
Though Sufism
is considered a part of Islam, it emerged as a reaction to the ‘shariyat’ i.e.
Islamic rigid rituals. It is
established that Sufism is influenced by four prominent ideals (1) Islamic
mysticism (2) Adwaita and Visishtawaita of Indians (3) the new faith of great
Greek philosopher Asfalthun and (4) Freedom of thought.
Among the
branches of Sufism, Nakshbandi and Chisti traditions are popular in India. Sufism and Medieval Bhakti Movement of India
share some features in common. Majority of these are the resultants of the
Indian influence on Islam and some are the resultants of Islamic influence on
Indian thought. In the medieval age,
which is called ‘Bhakti kal’ in the history of Hindi literature, many Bhakti
cults originated in India, specially in North India. Among these Bhakti Cults majority are the branches of
Vaishnavism. There are exceptions like
Sankara’s Adwaita, Basaveswara’s Veerashaiva etc. This was the time monks or sanyasis, or vedantins or saints also
emerged. This was the necessity of that
time.
The highly
rigid vedic tradition kept the society and common man at bay from religion and
philosophy. The Jaina and Boudha
religions preached their philosophy to the common man and their influence was
great on the society. Some Muslim
rulers enforced their religion on their subjects, again with the rigid
rules. Religious rigidity made people
frustrated and the religious cleavage among the people in the society
deepened. Already some Muslim rulers
realised that through political authority they could achieve partially and
total achievement could be through religion.
But the rigidity of the rituals made it the other way.
At that
juncture to soothe the frustration of the individuals and patch up the gap in
the society a cultural harmony was needed.
That need was realised in many forms like adoption of Sufism by poets,
saints (Sants) who were the advocates for the realization of the Omnipresent
and different Bhakti movements propounded by preachers like Ramanuja, Vallabha,
Chaitanya, Basaveswara etc. Saints
preached humanity which is above all the religions, and shunned the social
evils. But the preachers of Bhakti
Cults inculcated love towards Gods without saying anything against anything,
which overcomes many barriers like religion, caste etc.
As Sufi was a
reaction to ‘Shariyat’ Vaishnava Bhakti movements are the reactions to the
rigid vedic rituals. The cause of
origin itself is common to these two religions. One more great similarity is that both of them aimed at bringing
harmony and equality in the society and achieved it to some extent. We find many saints who tried for the
culmination of the two faiths like Saibaba and Ayyappa, who are being
worshipped by both the religions. The
exemplary unification of these faiths can be seen in Tirupati, the great
pilgrimage centre to all Hindus, Bibi Nanchari being accepted and worshipped as
the consort of Lord Venkateshwara. One
can say it definitely that the present harmony between Hinduism and Islam is
due to the Sufism and Vaishnava Bhakti movements. Both are open in their outlook and their approach is smooth and
all-embracing.
Sufism and
Madhura Bhakti of Vaishnavism look as if they are the two sides of the same
coin in some aspects. In other aspects
they look alike. In both love is the
life line. In Sufism love for god can
be realised through the love in the mundane world Madhura Bhakti itself means
love for god or divine love. Here is
observed the main difference. In Sufism
god is symbolised as the bride and the devotee as bridegroom. The hero is only one but the heroines canbe
many, as god may manifest in many forms as different heroines can be many. But in Madhura Bhakti the devotee is the
nayika (female lover) and god the nayaka (the male counter part). In Vaishnava doctrine all this creation is
considered feminine so the devotee, a part of this creation, is also
feminine. In both the religions the
description of the love in separation (Viyog shrungar) is more. In Madhura Bhakti, the love in union (Samyog
shrungar) also appears.
Like the
vedic seers Sufis are also nature lovers.
The beauty of the Nature overwhelms the devotee with joy and he wants to
see the original beauty, God. Even in Madhura Bhakti Nature plays a great role.
The whole creation is feminine and wishes to unite with the only masculine
beauty, the ‘Parama Purusha’, the God. In this process whenever a devotee is
doing Sadhana, i.e. undergoing hardships of penance, Nature also takes part in
it. Some poets described the beauty of the nature in different seasons and some
described it as the evolution in the nature surrounding the devotee. For
example in Panduranga Mahatyam, Tenali Rama Krishna Kavi describes the nature
around Radha who was doing penance. Whatever she achieved reflected in the
surrounding nature. The description of 2 months, 6 seasons seen in Sufi
literature shows the influence of ‘Rutuvarnana, of Indian Prabandhas.
Mysticistm is
one more common feature in both the religions. In Sufi literature the devotee
always seeks to get the drink from the hands of the lady love. To a common man
it looks different. But it has a noble meaning to the devotee. The wine is the
love and lover is God. Mysticism is an important feature in Madhura Bhakti
also, that is why in many places we find the word ‘Rasah Kreeda Rahogatha’etc.
Symbolism is
also a common tenet. In Madhura Bhakti every mundane thing has a symbolic
meaning like the colour of god, his dress, his ornaments, people, around etc.
In Sufism also the jug of wine (madhupatra) the serpent and Satan are all
symbolic expressions only.
Merging with
god alone, is the highest achievement in Sufism. This can be compared to the ‘Ekantha Bhakti’, being alone with
god. This is a concept of mysticism.
When the entire creation becomes one female, where is the possibility of a third
being to be present except god and devotee.
This is the reason for the privacy of all gopis with Krishna in the
group also.
Reading
Quran, singing devotional songs, going on pilgrimages and creation of
messengers (Duta and Duti) may be the influence of Indian thought.
One
conspicuous contrast is that there is no female preacher or poet in Sufism. In
Indian literary panorama we see some poetesses, and their number is
considerably more in Madhura Bhakti branch.
One great
feature seen in Indian Sufi literature is, the establishment of Sufi philosophy
of love by narrating the stories of Indian families. The ultimate aim is to
establish the philosophy of love, through the narration of the love story. This
caused the harmony of the two communities.
A unique
feature seen in both the religions, is that the devotee becomes frenzied
(Unmada) by drinking the wine of god’s love or Bhakti Rasa. Chaitanya
Mahaprabhu running amuck after experiencing Krishna is an example for this.
Radhacharita
in Telugu was an off-shoot of Vaishnava Bhakti movement. So we find that many
‘Vaggeyakaras (a poet who can sing) works are full of Madhura Bhakti like
Annamayya, Kshetrayya, Sarangapani etc.
Kshetrayya
compares Bhakti with Madhu(wine) which is a Sufi belief. Unusual to Madhura
Bhakti or Indian tradition in some of his ‘padas’, Kshetrayya depicts god as
the heroine, and himself as the hero. “Etuvanti stree ka pondina, hitavidi
yanduma…” “Yetuvanti mohamo kani yelanaga…” etc, can be given as examples of
love of Nayaka towards divine Nayika. This might be due to the influence of
Sufism which permeated in the society and became a part of the society.
The influence
of Sufism on Telugu Literature has to be studied intensively which may throw
new light on this subject.