“KANYASULKAM”
S. M. Y. SASTRY
[Kanyasulkam is the first and the greatest original
drama clothed in spoken Telugu dialect by Gurazada Venkata Appa Rao (1862-1915). It may not be widely known due to
language, cultural and other constraints. But it should be reckoned as one of
the great plays of the world. When it was first published it was hailed as an
event in the history of Telugu literature. Every character in the play is a
type and at the same time individual. The drama is a landmark of perfect characterisation.
The social problems which were in vogue when the play was written are obsolete
today. But the drama Kanyasulkam lives. The century of the play is being
celebrated this year in Andhra Pradesh.
Editor]
Kanyasulkam is the first original drama to be written in the Telugu spoken dialect. It is also the first Telugu drama with a social theme, and it is by far the best drama in Telugu literature so far.
The author, Mr. G. V. Appa Rao, “wrote it to advance the cause of social reform and to combat a popular prejudice that the Telugu language was unsuited to the stage. Itinerant Marathi troupes staged Hindi plays in the Telugu districts and made money. Local companies copied their example, and audiences listened with delight to what they did not understand. The bliss of ignorance could not have been more forcibly illustrated.”
Literary prose in Telugu, as in many other languages, was, and still is, different from the spoken dialect. It was a highly artificial and conventional form. Progress in any language comes through a constant approximation of the literary to the spoken form. Pandits, however, discountenanced this approximation. Mr. Appa Rao, the author, found that the highly artificial and archaic literary Telugu was unsuited for the expression of living sentiments or for reaching the masses. He was one of the earliest and staunchest advocates of the claims of the spoken dialect. “I know it is not arguments that will evolve a new literary dialect for Telugu” he wrote. “A great writer must write and make it: let us prepare the ground for it.” With a view to prepare a model and demonstrate the practicability of his ideas he wrote this play. He has produced not a mere model but a masterpiece. He has set up a standard very difficult but a masterpiece. He has set up a standard very difficult to approach. The language is superb: often it is a model and demonstrate the practicability of his ideas he wrote this play. He has produced not a mere model but a masterpiece. He has set up a standard very difficult but a masterpiece. He has set up a standard very difficult to approach. The language is superb: often it is musical. If today most of the literary output in Telugu is written in the “Vyavaharikabhasha” – the spoken dialect–not a little of the credit for this is due to him.
The second purpose with which this play was written was the advocacy of social reform. The need for social reform, in its manifold aspects of widow remarriage, the abolition of the practice of taking bride-money, the opposition to early marriages, and the abhorrence of the ideas of ‘keeping’ prostitutes is the theme of the drama. He has singled out, however, the practice of giving away in marriage mere babes to old men in consideration of fat sums, the practice of selling girls, for his broadside attack and dealt with other evils incidentally. He evolved a complex plot, and developed convincing characters with which to lay bare the social evils he was seeking to attack.
The
central plot of the play is this: Agnihotravadhani, a bigoted, orthodox
Brahmin, determines to give his second daughter, Subbi, aged about eight years,
in marriage to Lubdhavadhani, a rich miser of sixty-five years, for a
consideration of 1,800 rupees. Venkamma, Agnihotravadhani’s
wife, who was remorseful on account of the fate that already befell their
first daughter, Butchamma, in similar circumstances, strongly objects to this,
threatens to commit suicide if the plan is carried out, and entreats Karataka
Sastri, her brother, to avert this calamity. Lubdhavadhani, the bridegroom, was
first reluctant to get married. His desire for a wife was outweighed by his
abhorrence of parting with money. But Ramappa Pantulu, the diplomat of the
village, who made a living by his wits, frightens him into matrimony notwithstanding
the loss of money it might incidentally involve – with the astrological
prediction that his fate would be miserable unless he got married. Ramappa
Pantulu further predicted that a wife now would be the cause of immense
financial gain! Karataka Sastri, finding it impossible to dissuade his
brother-in-law from carrying out this project, resorts to subterfuge. Under the
guise of one Guntur Sastri, with a disciple of his dressed up as his daughter,
he approaches Ramappa Pantulu. With the help of Madhuravani, the dancing girl,
a former friend of his but now in the ‘keep’ of Ramappa Pantulu, he prevails
upon Ramappa Pantulu to consent to break this alliance with Agnihotravadhani,
and instead to recommend his daughter to Lubdhavadhani. As an inducement to Lubdhavadhani
for this change-over the new ‘girl’ is to be offered for Rs. 1,200 only, and
Ramappa Pantulu is to get half of this sum for his services. Ramappa Pantulu
forges a letter as from Agnihotravadhani refusing Lubdhavadhani’s alliance, and
settles the second match.
Ramappa
Pantulu however finds that he was double-crossed and cheated out of his lawful
share. In his absence Guntur Sastri was able to persuade Lubdhavadhani to a ‘one-night’
marriage, get it celebrated and disappear with the money, leaving no trace
behind. In anger and disgust, Ramappa Pantulu throws out a suggestion that the
girl must have been a widow, surreptitiously married away a second time:
otherwise, would the father have disappeared so completely? This works
Lubdhavadhani into a state of hysteria: he has a nightmare that the former
husband of his newly-wedded wife was strangling him to death. In the confusion
that follows, the ‘bride’ slips away, and throwing off ‘her’ garb, joins his
master. Ramappa Pantulu has borrowed a jewel from Madhuravani and lent it to
the bride for the marriage. The disciple, before he joins his master, returns
the jewel to Madhuravani, but Madhuravani
refuses Ramappa Pantulu admission into the house unless he brings the jewel
back. Lubdhavadhani finds that the bride has disappeared. Also, Ramappa
Pantulu charges him with the murder of that girl and the theft of the jewel.
Meanwhile, Agnihotravadhani, in blissful ignorance of all that has happened,
turns up for the marriage with an immense train of relations and friends, only
to find that the intended bridegroom is already married. He chastises
Lubdhavadhani physically, but Ramappa Pantulu induces him to finance the false
case he was launching against Lubdhavadhani for the murder of the ‘girl.’
Agnihotravadhani also finds that his first daughter – a child-widow and a
victim of his greed - has eloped, during the journey, with her brother’s tutor,
Girisam. Agnihotravadhani files a complaint against Girisam for abduction: but
the girl’s age being falsely given, and the full details regarding Girisam not
being known, the case has to be left in the air and later withdrawn.
Threatened
with a criminal complaint, and terribly ashamed of his folly in trying to get
married in his old age, Lubdhavadhani falls at the feet of Saujanya Rao, an
extremely good and virtuous lawyer. Under his influence Lubdhavadhani even
consents to get his widowed daughter re-married. Saujanya Rao exposes the
treachery of Ramappa Pantulu and warns him off. Meanwhile, Karataka Sastri, coming
to know of the straits of which Lubdhavadhani has been reduced, comes to
Madhuravani to request her to return the jewel so that he might send both the
jewel and the money back to Lubdhavadhani which would be proof enough that he
had not committed the crime. Madhuravani gives the jewel, but herself goes to
Saujanya Rao. Saujanya Rao is a reformer; he had taken a vow that he would not
see a dancing girl; therefore, she goes to him in male attire, and winning his
confidence reveals herself, and the whole hoax of the marriage. The calamity is
thus successfully averted. Lubdhavadhani learns his lesson and is won over to
the path of reform. Agnihotravadhani is unrepentant to the last, but what of
it? His plans for marrying off his daughter had been successfully thwarted. His
elder daughter had eloped. He had to spend most of his property in futile
preparations for marriage, and in litigation against Lubdhavadhani and Girisam.
The plot tangles itself and is finally unravelled with rare skill; events move with astonishing rapidity. The characters with which the drama is unfolded are varied, and are drawn from life with a depth of understanding.
Agnihotravadhani is a blind, bigoted, orthodox, pig-headed Brahmin. He is impatient of opposition or counsel; he scorns diplomacy. His method is the frontal attack. He can be insensitive enough to abuse a guest who comes to his house; prepare to marry off his daughter to a dying man in spite of the protests of his whole family–nay, notwithstanding the attempted suicide of his wife. He is unbending to the last. There is magnificence about his Himalayan stubbornness, for he knows not to stoop even to conquer.
Lubdhavadhani,
the old bridegroom, in contrast to
Agnihotravadhani, is a weakling. His only strength is his miserliness, but
there is not enough strength even in his miserliness. The only redeeming feature, however, is that there is no
nauseating meanness about him. While it is true that he counts the cost of
everything, he can, it is obvious, be made to overlook that aspect by threats
and intimidation. He is won over in the end to the cause of social reform, but
it is a conversion born of sheer necessity. There is no spectacular “change of
heart.” To the end he remained a sop depending on one or other of his counsellors.
He can only excite our pity, not our admiration like Agnihotravadhani or our
sympathy like Madhuravani.
Ramappa Pantulu is made of sterner stuff. He is the diplomat par excellence; the type that delights in making and unmaking empires. His is an extremely fertile brain; and he is never at a loss to extricate himself from any situation, however complex or difficult it might be. He has no heart, no scruple and no fear; he is a thorough-bred scoundrel, who never hesitates to commit any crime to serve his private gain. But there is no clumsiness about anything he does. To each plan of his, either of conception or of execution, he brings to bear immense skill. He makes one marvel at his dexterity!
Karataka Sastri is a match to Ramappa Pantulu in every respect: only, he is fortunately on the right side of law, and has used his powers for a righteous cause. He works with so great a smoothness that we almost miss taking note of him. He it is that foils the attempts of everyone. The daring with which he plans and executes the hoax, and the skill with which he outwits even the vigilant Ramappa Pantulu are unrivalled.
Saujanya Rao is the strong, though not the silent, good man; but not one who makes a fetish of his principles. He, who took a vow not to see dancing girls, consents to kiss one – to extract evidence which will save Lubdhavadhani.
But
there is no sweeter personality than Madhuravani in the whole range of Telugu
dramatic literature. She is truer to life than Vasantasena; and dearer than most
of the unbending virtuous heroines. She is cultured, sophisticated and
virtuous. She has her own principles, and plays the game majestically. There is
no vulgarity in her. She can bring a man to ruin, heartlessly; deceive him
without any qualms of conscience; and yet rise to great heights to sacrifice in
the most matter-of-fact way. Her profession
has not killed her finer sentiments.
Into
this complex plot is introduced Girisam. Girisam is the tutor of Venkatesam,
the son of Agnihotravadhani, and he is related to Lubdhavadhani. He is a
typical social reformer of the spurious kind-a social reformer because social reform is the fashion! His capacity for
brilliant conversation is his strength. It is merely unfortunate, of course,
that he now and then finds it convenient to change his principles, but he is
never at a loss to find convincing arguments in justification; likewise it is
unfortunate that he cannot put his principles into practice. Dancing girls are
his weakness and he is compelled to be anti - notch in theory. Girisam is a
lovable rogue. But he is not evil - minded. Compared to Ramappa Pantulu, he is
a saint. While Ramappa Pantulu seduces and deserts Meenakshi, the widowed
daughter of Lubdhavadhani, Girisam, placed in similar circumstances, plans for
an elopement and for a sanctified marriage with Butchamma, the widowed daughter
of Agnihotravadhani. Girisam is often childish in his bluffs. “To talk with me
in itself is an education” is his boast. But there is grandeur in the sweep of
his imagination, that takes our breath away and endears him to everybody. He
moves across the stage like a Colossus, vanquishing his opponents by his ‘dynamic
logic.’ A sample of his ‘brilliant’ logic may be given. From an opponent of
early marriages he turns, under stress of circumstances, into a supporter of
them, justifying his conduct with this argument: “Widow-marriage is the best
form of social reform-the sign of civilisation. ‘Widow’ means of course a young
beautiful widow and not an old crony with half a dozen children. How can there
be young widows without infant marriages? Hence infant marriages are essential!”
So much imagination and wit have gone to the making of the character of Girisam
that he is today as concrete as a living personality to the Telugus.
As far as the plot is concerned, however, Girisam is not essential; as a matter of fact, he is out of place. In the drama, he is merely the person with whom Butchamma elopes. Girisam must have taken the author himself by storm, and argued and bluffed his way into the drama!