Bhaavas in Vaishnavism
and Saivism:
A Comparative Study
ARVIND SHARMA
Department of Religious
Studies,
I
The
tradition of Bhakti in Hinduism, both in its Vaishnava
and Saiva forms, involves the adoption or cultivation
of certain attitudes towards the Ishtadevata.
Thus in Hinduism:
Devotion
to God assumes many forms, and the bhakta or
devotee may hold himself as related to God in one or more bhaavas
or attitudes, the chief of which are: (1) daasya-bhaava
(daasa,
‘slave’), the attitude of a servant to his master, such as that of Hanumaan to Raama; (2) sakhya-bhaava (sakhi, ‘friend’), the
attitude of a friend to a friend, as that of Arjuna
to Krishna; (3) vaatsalya-bhaava (vatsala,
‘a cow with a new-born calf’), the attitude of a parent to a child,
as Kausalya to Rama; (4) saanta-bhaava (saanti,
‘tranquil’), the attitude of a child to a parent, as Dhruva to Suniti (5) kaanta-bhaava (kaanta, ‘desired’), the
attitude of a wife to her husband, as Sita to Rama (6) rati-bhaava (rati, ‘passion’),
the attitude of the beloved to her lover, as Raadha
to Krishna; (7) dveshya-bhaava, (dvesha,
‘hatred’), the attitude of an atheist or god-hater towards God, as Sisupaala king of Chedi to
Krishna; this notion is based on the Tantrik belief
that an intense feeling towards the deity may even be expressed in hatred for
him, since this implies a belief (albeit concealed) in God’s terrible rage and
power.1
The
purpose of this paper is to draw attention to the fact that though some if not
many of these attitudes are shared by Vashnavism and Saivism, their ordinal ranking varies.
From
the point of view of Vaishnavism, the following may
be taken to be a fairly representative statement of the stages, especially as
all the examples are drawn from Vaishnava lore.
The
Bhakti-saastras speak of nineteen attitudes or
bhaavas which the bhakta
may adopt towards his deity. The most important of these are six: daasya, sakhya, vaatsalya, saanta, kaanta and madhura.
Daasya-bhaava is the attitude of a servant to his
master. Hanumaan is the classical example of an ideal
servant of God. This type of relationship marks the beginning of love. At
a later stage bhakti gets deepened and is comparable to the love and
regard that a man has for his friend. This is sakhya-bhaava.
The relationship between Kuchela and
III
On
the Saiva side, the following statement may be taken as
fairly representative.
The
path to release consists of four stages: caryaa,
kriyaa, yoga and jnaana.
The first stands for external acts of worship like cleaning the temples,
gathering flowers for the deity, etc; This is called daasa-maarga,
the path of the servant; its proximate
goal is saalokya, residence in the
realm of God. The next stage which is kriyaa
is marked by acts of intimate service to God. This path is known as satputra-maarga, the path of the good son.
The objective of this discipline is saamipya,
attaining the nearness of God. The third discipline is yoga which means union, and here signifies contemplation and internal
worship. Through this method, the devotee hero becomes more intimate with God,
as a friend with a friend. The path, therefore, is called sakhaa-maarga,
the path of friendship. It leads to saarupya,
gaining the form of God. The three disciplines so far explained constitute
the preparatory stages in the journey to perfection. The direct means to
perfection is jnaana (knowledge). This
path is termed san-maarga because it takes the
soul straight to sat which is God. Its fruit is the ultimate human goal
which is saayujya, union with God. This
union is called advaita in the Saiva-siddhaanta. But it does not mean non-difference; it
means only non-separateness from God. Even in the state of release, the soul is entitatively
different from God. But it then shares in the nature of Siva. It becomes similar to God in that it regains its
infinitude, pervasiveness and omniscience. 3
IV
A
comparison of the two reveals
that:
(1)
there is a greater variety of attitudes permitted in Vaishnava
than in Saiva Bhakti;
(2)
in Vaishnavism, the attitude
of friendship occupies a lower place than that of sonship and the roles are reversed
in Saivism.
Both
of these facts seem to be
explicable in terms of the
comparative theologies of Vaishnavism and Saivism. The main
explanation of the differences
seems to lie around the doctrine of avataara or incarnation which is
characteristic of Vaishnavism but not of
Saivism. 3 Since the attitudes to
the divine are modelled on human and specially family relationships, the range of such
relationships in the case of an
incarnating God is increased. For instance, as strictly speaking Siva does not
incarnate in a family like Vishnu the bhaava of Vaatsalya
may be regarded as virtually non-operational in his case. The same fact might
account for the downgrading of the
attitude of sonship
as compared to friendship.
To
conclude: the number and order of bhaavas in Vaishnavism
and Saivism seems to vary; and this seems to be a
theological variable.
1 Benjamin Walker, The
Hindu World, Vol. I (New York: Frederick A Praeger,
1968), p. 138. Also see Manasusai Dhavamony,
Love of God According to Saiva
Siddhaanta (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1971),
Chapter I.
2 T. M. P. Mahadevan, Outlines of Hinduism (Bombay:
Chetana Ltd., 1960), p. 91.
3 T. M. P. Mahadevan, op. cit., pp. 171-172.
4 See Geoffrey Parrinder,
Avatar and Incarnation (London: Faber and Faber, 1970), passim,
especially Chapter 7.